Perhaps you or someone in the know could answer one of my "obvious" questions that don't seem to be getting answered .....
If VAR can be used to make a decision about if Son did or didn't feign or stop in his run up, how on earth are ANY penalty goals ever given during VAR games? For the last 5 or so years EVERY goalkeeper without fail has moved in front of his goal line BEFORE the kick is taken . This IS a clear and obvious error and should require the kick to be retaken (probably 10 or 20 times ). Also there were about 6 or 7 players from both teams inside the penalty area which requires the kick to be retaken ......... before you can even consider making a ruling on the validity of the kick itself.
Yet another case of VAR being a CLEAR AND OBVIOUS ERROR.
Also the game was stopped in excess of 8 mins in the first half, but only 5 were added on during a period that Rochdale were having probably their best period of the game ........ If they are considering VAR as an option SURELY there has to be a "Running clock" on view to all players/spectators which stops/starts when the ref stops his watch (like Ice Hockey) . It would also make the slow trudge from the most distant part of the field to be substituted a thing of the past as the time it took is the time that is added on whether it be 10 secs or 90 secs.