ClimateChange - EndTime 2050 - Disturbing Report Sheds Light on

[Whistler]

https://memegenerator.net/img/instances ... s-maam.jpg

[Whistler]

The vast majority of UM members will have well and truly fallen off the perch before the technology has taken any meaningful effect.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The only places in the entire world that use the electric chair are the backwards states of Alabama, Florida, South Carolina, Kentucky, and Tennessee. Like the demise of the barbaric volt jolter, the world is more enlightened, far from not embracing technology, they have grabbed it with both hands.

Germany 46% renewable, Britain 28% renewable, Sweden 56% renewable, Norway 98% renewable, etc. etc. Even Australia which is a laggard, is doubling renewables evey year.

The only thing falling off the perch is the climate deniers who become more and more isolated every year.

[Barney]

This could be a good project with lots of new technology and massive kw output.

https://idadesal.org/saudi-arabias-neom ... this-year/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BillaRickaDickay]

Kinda funny, Norway 98% renewables but also the highest producer of oil after Russia in Europe.
If it's not for domestic use, some one is buying it, burning it, processing it, creating all those nasty gasses, obviously nothing to do with going green, must be something to do with cash.
I guess without it exporting fish alone wouldn't quite fill the gap.

[AlexO]

Kinda funny, Norway 98% renewables but also the highest producer of oil after Russia in Europe.
If it's not for domestic use, some one is buying it, burning it, processing it, creating all those nasty gasses, obviously nothing to do with going green, must be something to do with cash.
I guess without it exporting fish alone wouldn't quite fill the gap.

Before Sturgeon jumped into bed with the Greens so she had a majority in the Kid On Assembly in Scotland she was all for producing as much oil and gas as possible, but selling it abroad so they produced the CO2 and she could claim Scots lived in a Net Zero utopia while nothing really changed worldwide. Wee hypocritical witch.

[tamada]

Kinda funny, Norway 98% renewables but also the highest producer of oil after Russia in Europe.
If it's not for domestic use, some one is buying it, burning it, processing it, creating all those nasty gasses, obviously nothing to do with going green, must be something to do with cash.
I guess without it exporting fish alone wouldn't quite fill the gap.

Before Sturgeon jumped into bed with the Greens so she had a majority in the Kid On Assembly in Scotland she was all for producing as much oil and gas as possible, but selling it abroad so they produced the CO2 and she could claim Scots lived in a Net Zero utopia while nothing really changed worldwide. Wee hypocritical witch.

The truth is the Norwegians voted to manage their hydrocarbon revenues sensibly. They frequently revised the rules and regulations to their greater benefit as the dynamics of North Sea exploration and the developing technologies dictated. All this with a view to building a society with self-sustaining socially caring community while investing wisely to build strong, national sovereign wealth.

It also helped having a population smaller than Scotland's and not having witless secessionists shouting, "It's Rogaland's oil!"

FWIW, by the early 1980s Britain had become a net exporter of oil, and by the mid-1990s of gas so the Tories didn't need to get into bed with the treehuggers back then. It's arguable that the subsequent Labour administrations didn't handle the inevitable decline in oil and gas revenues and re-investment as well as the Norwegians did.

[pepesgrill]

i once had a norwegian guy explain to me the
reason they all got this honking big pension was
all the state-owned offshore norway oil rigs

[tamada]

i once had a norwegian guy explain to me the
reason they all got this honking big pension was
all the state-owned offshore norway oil rigs

There are no state-owned rigs in Norwegian waters inasmuch as the government is an equal investor in offshore exploration, sharing the cost of their implementation and development as well as a share of the profits therefrom.

https://www.regjeringen.no/en/topics/en ... /id440538/

[pepesgrill]

basically , what i just said . from your source
" the largest stream of gov't revenue , economic
growth, financing norwegian welfare "

" the state pays it's share of investments& costs
and correspondingly receives returns."
as stated, briefest synopsis from norway pensioner

[tamada]

basically , what i just said .

The average Norwegian is pretty thick on the ins and outs of their hydrocarbon infused largesse. What's your excuse?

[pepesgrill]

there was one engineer i respected. montgomery
scott of u.s. enterprise .sadly downhill since then

[tamada]

I see what you did there.

Cheers,
Sean

[pepesgrill]

myself, i dont care . but i wont have you insulting
the norwegians. a line needs to be drawn here

[pepesgrill]

and norway is actively reforesting and has been
for decades. dont know many countries that have
been proactive in that regard. they still have wood

[Doodoo]

Loads of countries in the world replanting trees, just have to have a looky see

https://tree-nation.com/projects

[pepesgrill]

in one year, a mature tree will absorb 50 lbs of
CO2 . turning everything into parking lot not helping

[Barney]

So called climate deniers claim a victory.
The pushers of doom are being questioned.
Aussie farmers take revenge.

FARMERS TAKE A GREEDY WIND FARM OPERATOR TO COURT OVER NOISE POLLUTION AND WIN!
The multinational corporations that own Australia’s wind farms must be shaking in their boots…

In a landmark ruling last Friday, Supreme Court Justice Melinda Richards ruled in favour of two
Gippsland farmers who say a neighbouring wind farm has emitted unreasonable noise at their
properties since 2015.

As a result, Bald Hills Wind Farm has been ordered to pay complainants John Zakula and Noel Uren
$168,000 and $92,000 respectively: half for noise disturbance, at $12,000 per year, and half in
aggravated damages because the company’s conduct was “high-handed” towards them.

The wind farm must also curtail its operations to stop the night-time noise disturbance at John’s
house. If the company can’t fix the problem within three months, the noisy turbines near John’s house
will be shut permanently at night.

Well done, fellas! This is a huge victory for the tens of thousands of Australians who are forced
to put up with the invasive noise and electromagnetic fields generated by wind farms.

The precedent has now been set and ADVANCE and our 195,000+ supporters look forward to
seeing more fed-up farmers demand compensation from the multinational wind cartels who are
compromising their sleep and health!

As John said himself, “I still hear the turbines over everything. Whenever there’s been a few really
bad nights in a row, I drive my car down to the beach and sleep in it. Your body feels tight, your
head feels in a compressive state. You just have to get out of the place.” Note this was after John
had replaced a floor-to-ceiling glass window with bluestone at his home.

Lawyer Dominica Tannock, who represented John and Noel, said the decision was the first of its kind
in Australia and would set a precedent for individuals challenging large corporations. “This
judgment will send shivers down the spine of corporate Australia and around the world,” she
said.


Justice Richards even slammed the wind farm for “denying that they had any cause for complaint,
minimising their lived experience of the noise and treating them as hypersensitive trouble-makers,”
said Justice Richards, who concluded the men were not hypersensitive to noise.

Speaking of hypersensitivity, ADVANCE wonders why the RSPCA isn’t celebrating this ruling?
As we reported last year, wind farms kill crabs, birds and cattle.

According to a report by Associate Professor Alastair Lyndon from Heriot-Watt University’s Centre
for Marine Biology and Diversity, brown crabs “seem to be attracted” to the electromagnetic fields
emitted from Britain’s offshore wind turbines. The crabs “just sit still” and don’t “move, forage for
food or seek a mate. Exposure to higher levels of electromagnetic field strength changed the number
of blood cells in the crabs’ bodies…making them more susceptible to bacterial infection”.

Birds face a similar fate. According to the American Bird Conservancy Foundation, around 1.17
million birds are killed by wind turbines in the United States each year. In Tasmania, 29 wedge-tailed Eagles died after flying into wind farms. BirdLife Tasmania spokesman, Dr Eric Woehler says, “turbines threaten migratory Arctic shorebirds, some already listed as critically endangered, that make
the Robbins Passage-Boullanger Bay wetland complex their southern summer home.

”Even our cows will suffer. In France, farmers are claiming that electricity from wind turbines that
travels through the ground are leading to severe weight loss in animals and even death. Cows are
more vulnerable to these currents, humans have an electrical resistance of 1500 Ohms but the cows
can only cop 500 Ohms (not to mention that they are not separated from the ground by rubber soles).

It’s unclear whether these wind farms even turn a profit.

Just ask Victoria's Hepburn wind farm that made a tidy post-tax profit of $354,546 even though it
only produced $293,815 in electricity (thanks to a generous government grant and the sale of
“renewable” energy certificates).
Bloody good money if you can get it…


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Sport]

So called climate deniers claim a victory.
The pushers of doom are being questioned.
Aussie farmers take revenge.

FARMERS TAKE A GREEDY WIND FARM OPERATOR TO COURT OVER NOISE POLLUTION AND WIN!
The multinational corporations that own Australia’s wind farms must be shaking in their boots…

In a landmark ruling last Friday, Supreme Court Justice Melinda Richards ruled in favour of two
Gippsland farmers who say a neighbouring wind farm has emitted unreasonable noise at their
properties since 2015.

As a result, Bald Hills Wind Farm has been ordered to pay complainants John Zakula and Noel Uren
$168,000 and $92,000 respectively: half for noise disturbance, at $12,000 per year, and half in
aggravated damages because the company’s conduct was “high-handed” towards them.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Great news indeed. They are an eyesore on the landscape. Solar may play an active role for energy production and batteries for storage is another problem, constructed by plastic, metal that comes from mining I believe. Climate change is just a natural phase of the earth, happened before and will happen again by its own forces. Severe climate change by humans is a hoax.

[papafarang]

You know 300 years ago if you had complaints about a friggin windmill they would have told you to go and starve then, seriosly have Aussies become sad sacs. Oh I'm so upset about a bit of noise, really is Australia becoming a source of PC. I'm sure Luddites didn't like the sound of windmills either. If I had a choice between a coal powered station next to my home or a windmill , well guess which one

[pepesgrill]

So called climate deniers claim a victory.
The pushers of doom are being questioned.
Aussie farmers take revenge.

FARMERS TAKE A GREEDY WIND FARM OPERATOR TO COURT OVER NOISE POLLUTION AND WIN!
The multinational corporations that own Australia’s wind farms must be shaking in their boots…

there have been many complaints & lawsuits about these things. its hard to imagine the scale
unless you've seen one up close. they're like 500
ft high. i dont doubt that droning and beating the
wind causes sleep difficulties. not near house