air force exercise

Udon Thani news, views and comments
User avatar
tamada
udonmap.com
Posts: 17221
Joined: February 21, 2007, 4:03 am
Location: Down two...then left

Re: air force exercise

Post by tamada » August 18, 2022, 7:44 pm

Earnest wrote:
August 18, 2022, 6:40 pm
Crikey, those Alpha jets must have loads of hours on the airframes, they've been flying for years. I wonder if they were purchased second hand.
What? Longer than Nok's 737's?


'Don't waste your words on people who deserve your silence'
~Reinhold Messner~

'You don't have to be afraid of everything you don't understand'
~Louise Perica~

User avatar
Earnest
udonmap.com
Posts: 4331
Joined: January 14, 2014, 3:56 am

Re: air force exercise

Post by Earnest » August 18, 2022, 10:36 pm

Dunno, how old are Nok's 737s?
This message has been submitted successfully, but it will need to be approved by a moderator before it is publicly viewable. You will be notified when your post has been approved.

User avatar
Earnest
udonmap.com
Posts: 4331
Joined: January 14, 2014, 3:56 am

Re: air force exercise

Post by Earnest » August 18, 2022, 10:36 pm

Dunno, how old are Nok's 737s?
This message has been submitted successfully, but it will need to be approved by a moderator before it is publicly viewable. You will be notified when your post has been approved.

User avatar
JimboPSM
udonmap.com
Posts: 3581
Joined: July 4, 2005, 3:23 pm
Location: Isle of Man / Bangkok / Udon Thani

Re: air force exercise

Post by JimboPSM » August 19, 2022, 8:47 am

Earnest wrote:
August 18, 2022, 6:40 pm
Crikey, those Alpha jets must have loads of hours on the airframes, they've been flying for years. I wonder if they were purchased second hand.
The Royal Thai Air Force acquired 25 “Alpha Jet A” aircraft in 1999 from the German Air Force.

20 of them were acquired for operational purpose and 5 for utilisation as spares.

It is not clear exactly how many of the 20 are currently operational (reported numbers vary from 17 to 19) so it appears that at least one of the Alpha Jets has been decommissioned.

.
Ashamed to be English since 23rd June 2016 when England voted for racism & economic suicide.

Disgusted that the UK is “governed” by a squalid bunch of economically illiterate, self-serving, sleazy and corrupt neo-fascists.

User avatar
JimboPSM
udonmap.com
Posts: 3581
Joined: July 4, 2005, 3:23 pm
Location: Isle of Man / Bangkok / Udon Thani

Re: air force exercise

Post by JimboPSM » August 19, 2022, 9:01 am

Earnest wrote:
August 18, 2022, 10:36 pm
Dunno, how old are Nok's 737s?
According to data from flightradar24 the average age of the Nok Air fleet of 13 Boeing 737-8 aircraft is 7.8 years with the youngest model being 4 years old and the oldest being 15 years old.

By way of comparison, the average age of the 409 Boeing 737-8 aircraft in the Ryanair fleet is 9.5 years with the youngest model being 3 years old and the oldest being 18 years old.

.
Ashamed to be English since 23rd June 2016 when England voted for racism & economic suicide.

Disgusted that the UK is “governed” by a squalid bunch of economically illiterate, self-serving, sleazy and corrupt neo-fascists.

User avatar
Earnest
udonmap.com
Posts: 4331
Joined: January 14, 2014, 3:56 am

Re: air force exercise

Post by Earnest » August 19, 2022, 12:20 pm

I see, thank you.
This message has been submitted successfully, but it will need to be approved by a moderator before it is publicly viewable. You will be notified when your post has been approved.

User avatar
tamada
udonmap.com
Posts: 17221
Joined: February 21, 2007, 4:03 am
Location: Down two...then left

Re: air force exercise

Post by tamada » August 19, 2022, 12:25 pm

But Nok's fleet are higher mileage, especially when compared with the Alpha that crashed.
'Don't waste your words on people who deserve your silence'
~Reinhold Messner~

'You don't have to be afraid of everything you don't understand'
~Louise Perica~

User avatar
Udon Map
Admin
Posts: 2843
Joined: July 31, 2013, 7:57 pm

Re: air force exercise

Post by Udon Map » August 19, 2022, 3:11 pm

JimboPSM wrote:
August 19, 2022, 9:01 am
According to data from flightradar24 the average age of the Nok Air fleet of 13 Boeing 737-8 aircraft is 7.8 years with the youngest model being 4 years old and the oldest being 15 years old.

By way of comparison, the average age of the 409 Boeing 737-8 aircraft in the Ryanair fleet is 9.5 years with the youngest model being 3 years old and the oldest being 18 years old.
tamada wrote:
August 19, 2022, 12:25 pm
But Nok's fleet are higher mileage, especially when compared with the Alpha that crashed.
Age of the airframe is relatively insignificant. The last B-52 delivered to the U.S. Air Force was in 1962, 60 years ago this year. And they're still flying. It's the number of cycles that is more significant for the airframe. Flight hours do matter for the engines, but it's much easier (and less expensive) to re-engine an airframe than to replace the whole thing.

User avatar
Earnest
udonmap.com
Posts: 4331
Joined: January 14, 2014, 3:56 am

Re: air force exercise

Post by Earnest » August 19, 2022, 5:49 pm

We used to base everything on airframe flying hours in the RAF rather than cycles. For example, we had 25 hour and 50 hour maintenance packages stepping up to 150 (primary) 300 (Primary Star) and 600 (Minor) hours maintenance. Our Major maintenance was at 2400 flying hours.

Are you still awake?
This message has been submitted successfully, but it will need to be approved by a moderator before it is publicly viewable. You will be notified when your post has been approved.

User avatar
parrot
udonmap.com
Posts: 10925
Joined: March 19, 2006, 8:32 pm

Re: air force exercise

Post by parrot » August 19, 2022, 6:25 pm

I flew on RC135s during my AF career......1971, 1977-1984, intermittently between 1984-1995. The airframes started flying in the early 1960's and they're very active today.
The article is from 2008......50,000 hour mark for tail number 132. I'll guess many thousands more since then.

User avatar
Bandung_Dero
udonmap.com
Posts: 3614
Joined: July 10, 2005, 8:53 am
Location: Ban Dung or Perth W.A.

Re: air force exercise

Post by Bandung_Dero » August 19, 2022, 6:31 pm

Getting back on track:-
Had a number of jet aircraft playing games over our Tambon, 17 km NE of Ban Dung this morning. Too high to determine who, what, where or why, but making a kee load of noise.

PS. Moderators:- kee is acceptable but shillt is not?????
Sent from my 1977 Apple II using 2 Heinz bake bean cans and piano wire!

User avatar
jackspratt
udonmap.com
Posts: 16084
Joined: July 2, 2006, 5:29 pm

Re: air force exercise

Post by jackspratt » August 19, 2022, 8:18 pm

Bandung_Dero wrote:
August 19, 2022, 6:31 pm
Getting back on track:-
Had a number of jet aircraft playing games over our Tambon, 17 km NE of Ban Dung this morning. Too high to determine who, what, where or why, but making a kee load of noise.

PS. Moderators:- kee is acceptable but shillt is not?????
As I understand it, the censored naughty words are a function of google or windows - not the forum mods.

With the exception of the ultimate naughty word in the Thai context - k i n g. :roll:

User avatar
Bandung_Dero
udonmap.com
Posts: 3614
Joined: July 10, 2005, 8:53 am
Location: Ban Dung or Perth W.A.

Re: air force exercise

Post by Bandung_Dero » August 20, 2022, 8:26 am

I don't quite buy that, just type some words into the google search engine - there is no censorship there??
Sent from my 1977 Apple II using 2 Heinz bake bean cans and piano wire!

User avatar
Potamoi
udonmap.com
Posts: 470
Joined: April 11, 2022, 11:53 am
Location: Halfway between Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch and Ona-i-Lau

Re: air force exercise

Post by Potamoi » August 20, 2022, 9:11 am

jackspratt wrote:
August 19, 2022, 8:18 pm
Bandung_Dero wrote:
August 19, 2022, 6:31 pm

PS. Moderators:- kee is acceptable but shillt is not?????
As I understand it, the censored naughty words are a function of google or windows - not the forum mods.

With the exception of the ultimate naughty word in the Thai context - k i n g. :roll:
I reckon it is a function of phpBB, the backend forum software, to censor rude or disallowed words. I suppose there are some word replacements left up to the site admin in some type of cpanel and others that are the standard -----, ***** variety

https://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopic.php?t=920945
I fear the man who drinks water and so remembers this morning what the rest of us said last night
Benjamin Franklin

It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to talk and remove all doubt
Maurice Switzer *(assumed)

User avatar
FrazeeDK
udonmap.com
Posts: 4910
Joined: February 13, 2006, 2:02 am
Location: Udon Thani Thailand

Re: air force exercise

Post by FrazeeDK » August 20, 2022, 10:15 am

keep your fingers crossed. The Thai AF has been improving the Nam Phong airstrip for a while supposedly with Singaporean AF funding. Once that is completed the rumor is that larger exercises like this will fly out of that base rather than Udon RTAFB. That might miff the hoteliers housing the dozens (if not hundreds) of participants but I'm sure KK will haippily step up to the plate for that... Here's a Google Map Sat image of Nam Phong. You can see the construction/extension repairing of the strip. Don't know the date of the shot...https://www.google.co.th/maps/@16.65335 ... !1e3?hl=th
Dave

User avatar
parrot
udonmap.com
Posts: 10925
Joined: March 19, 2006, 8:32 pm

Re: air force exercise

Post by parrot » August 20, 2022, 10:24 am

Depending on what you want to believe, the current agreement between Udon/Singapore is until 2028, but there's hope that by 2026 the Nam Phong air strip will be ready.........which doesn't mean the Singapore AF or Udon will be ready. But Udon officials certainly have been taking heat for the noise levels.
https://www.thansettakij.com/economy/provincial/519650
https://siamrath.co.th/n/334508

User avatar
Khun Paul
udonmap.com
Posts: 7743
Joined: September 16, 2008, 3:28 pm
Location: Udon Thani

Re: air force exercise

Post by Khun Paul » August 20, 2022, 11:20 am

One of the problems as I see it is the way the RTAF commands, the same problem as Bangkok, refusing to move out of Don Muang made it plain the only expansion was to construct another Airport.
When militarily the need to have a Airbase inside the City limits is now pointless due to improvement in planes for the Airforce.
Heathrow was a Fighter station but moved for Civilian expansion.
Udon needs to expand BUT the RTAF thwart it most pf the time citing security requirements, which is utter balderdash.

User avatar
Earnest
udonmap.com
Posts: 4331
Joined: January 14, 2014, 3:56 am

Re: air force exercise

Post by Earnest » August 20, 2022, 4:53 pm

parrot wrote:
August 19, 2022, 6:25 pm
I flew on RC135s during my AF career......1971, 1977-1984, intermittently between 1984-1995. The airframes started flying in the early 1960's and they're very active today.
The article is from 2008......50,000 hour mark for tail number 132. I'll guess many thousands more since then.
You were crewing Rivet Joint? Yeah, I've never seen 50K flying hours on an airframe. The most is 12K, I suppose.
This message has been submitted successfully, but it will need to be approved by a moderator before it is publicly viewable. You will be notified when your post has been approved.

User avatar
tamada
udonmap.com
Posts: 17221
Joined: February 21, 2007, 4:03 am
Location: Down two...then left

Re: air force exercise

Post by tamada » August 20, 2022, 5:12 pm

Khun Paul wrote:
August 20, 2022, 11:20 am
One of the problems as I see it is the way the RTAF commands, the same problem as Bangkok, refusing to move out of Don Muang made it plain the only expansion was to construct another Airport.
When militarily the need to have a Airbase inside the City limits is now pointless due to improvement in planes for the Airforce.
Heathrow was a Fighter station but moved for Civilian expansion.
Udon needs to expand BUT the RTAF thwart it most pf the time citing security requirements, which is utter balderdash.
Refusing to move? Don Mueang belongs to the RTAF. They own it. Who could ever make them move? Bangkok needed a new airport because DMK couldn't be expanded, not because the owners wouldn't leave. The AOT must pay a whopping rent for those runways.

Don Muang was on the outskirts of Bangkok once so this "military value" theory is nonsense. Bangkok simply grew around it. London Heathrow was never a "fighter station" either.

Udon International Airport is operated by the DOA. There was some talk of it being transferred to AOT operatorship along with a few other domestic airports but Covid scuppered a lot of plans.

The balderdash is this fanciful notion of the RTAF thwarting commercial plans for Udon International. They're happy to bank the rent, landing fees, etc.. same as Don Meuang.
'Don't waste your words on people who deserve your silence'
~Reinhold Messner~

'You don't have to be afraid of everything you don't understand'
~Louise Perica~

User avatar
FrazeeDK
udonmap.com
Posts: 4910
Joined: February 13, 2006, 2:02 am
Location: Udon Thani Thailand

Re: air force exercise

Post by FrazeeDK » August 20, 2022, 8:09 pm

and I suspect any rent/fees/cash goes in a large portion to the base commander. That certainly would be an enticement to want further expansion of the civilian portion of the airport and international flights.

I wonder if the monies inputted into the various bureaucracies are divvied up similar to old British Navy Prize Court stipulations with the Commanding Admiral getting his mandated piece of the pie then on downwards to ship Captains and even the lower decks getting their pittance..
Dave

Post Reply

Return to “Udon Thani News”